We Are Terriers

We Are Terriers

Huddersfield Town have forgotten how to attack as a team

The late defeat to Bolton Wanderers was the best illustration yet of Town taking a muddled and ineffective approach on the ball

Steven Chicken's avatar
Steven Chicken
Oct 19, 2025
∙ Paid
Share
Ruben Roosken got into the final third for 15 minutes to good effect — then never troubled the opposition box again

Huddersfield Town have scored just four goals in seven games in all competitions (five in the league) since the 3-2 win over Peterborough on 6th September. Only one of those goals came from open play — Leo Castledine’s strike against Exeter.

In that time, Town have had 96 shots on goal, giving them an overall shot conversion rate of 4.2%. If we were able to separate the efforts from open play, we’d dare say it would be even lower.

We can measure the overall quality of chances created (regardless of the finish) by expected goals per shot. As a benchmark, the best side in the division for creating high-quality chances at the moment is Lincoln City, with 0.15 xG per shot. The worst is Blackpool, on 0.09 xG per shot.

Naturally, to be successful, you need to have three things: volume, quality, and finishing. It’s no good creating exclusively high-quality chances if you don’t convert many of them. It’s also no use creating lots of high-quality chances if you don’t actually take them.

So what’s Town’s issue lately? Volume, quality, or finishing?

From game to game, a bit of all three, and Bolton was the worst of the lot. Let’s pick through the game to see where they went wrong.

Get 7 day free trial

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to We Are Terriers to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Steven Chicken
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture